- ACME Solar is joined by Hero Future Energies and Vikram Solar in a legal battle against government decision to impose safeguard duty
- Hero Future is worried about no clarity offered by the government in ensuring smooth implementation of the pass-through option for projects already bid out
- Vikram Solar wants SEZs to be exempt from the duty, and that these be considered at par with manufacturing units located in domestic tariff area (DTA)
- Vikram Solar also wants already awarded EPC contracts to be out of the ambit of the duty
Targeted 100 GW Solar Power Capacity in India By 2022 Not Possible Says CRISIL, Which Expects 78 To 80 GW In Best Case Scenario; Rooftop Solar To Settle Only For 8 GW By 2023
(14. August 2018)
Orissa High Court Directs Indian Ministry Of Finance To Withdraw Safeguard Duty Notification; Next Hearing Scheduled For August 14, 2018
(10. August 2018)
Indian MNRE Head RK Singh Says Ladakh Holds 35 GW Solar Potential; Now He Plans To Launch Single Tender Of 25 GW With Storage & Deliverables In Una District
(10. August 2018)
In May 2018, the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) had confirmed to the Delhi High Court that interests of all stakeholders will be covered if in future there is a need to impose safeguard duty (see No Safeguard Duty On Solar Imports In India). MNRE was responding to a petition filed by ACME Solar challenging the levying of safeguard duty. The plea was eventually dismissed by the court as the government back then confirmed that it had no immediate plans to levy such a duty.
Now, despite ACME Solar getting a Orissa High Court order putting a temporary stay on an imposition of safeguard duties, the Government of India went ahead with the implementation of the tariffs (see 25% Safeguard Duty Imposed By India). It offers no clarity about the projects already confirmed.
Now, Hero Future Energies and Vikram Solar have joined in the legal battle.
The three companies have filed a petition against the Director General (Safeguards) DG of Trade Remedies in the Orissa High Court, according to Mercom India Research. They demand to make the ‘exercise of pass-through option seamless and practical’. They fear the process will get entangled in the bureaucratic and departmental procedures in the absence of clear guidelines.
Hero Future Energies CEO Sunil Jain was quoted by Mercom as saying that the sudden imposition of safeguard duty will affect projects already bid out. If there is no proper and smooth implementation of the pass-through option, these projects may become non-performing assets (NPA).
Local module manufacturer Vikram Solar, which has a manufacturing facility in the special economic zone in West Bengal, is also contesting the government decision in court. It is seeking exemption/clarification for SEZs from the duty, so that these are considered at par with manufacturing units located in domestic tariff area (DTA). It also wants EPC contracts already awarded to not be affected by the duty.
In the midst of all these developments around the safeguard duties, government agencies are on a spree to cancel already conducted auctions as project developers offer higher prices than expected (see SECI Cancels 3 GW Auction, Partially).